Skip to main content

World markets dive as Trump sparks trade, North Korea worries

Global stocks sank Wednesday after US President Donald Trump said he was not satisfied with talks that are aimed at averting a trade war with China. Equities were also dented by poor eurozone economic data, and as Trump cast doubt on a planned summit with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un. “Trump (is) continuing to drive uncertainty over global trade,” said analyst Joshua Mahony at trading firm IG. “European markets are following their Asian counterparts lower, as a pessimistic tone from Trump is compounded by downbeat economic data,” he added. Markets had surged Monday after US Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin and Chinese Vice Premier Liu He said they had agreed to pull back from imposing threatened tariffs on billions of dollars of goods, and continue talks on a variety of trade issues. However, Trump has declared that he was “not satisfied” with the status of the talks, fuelling worries that the world’s top two economies could still slug out an economically pain...

China threatens US with tariffs, says ‘not afraid of trade war’.

China warned the United States on Friday that it was “not afraid of a trade war” as it threatened tariffs on $3 billion worth of US goods in retaliation over President Donald Trump’s moves against Chinese imports.
Beijing unveiled a hit list of products that could face duties of up to 25 percent, from fresh fruit to pork and wine, though it stopped short of pulling the trigger as it indicated its readiness to negotiate an agreement.
The latest trade action sent stocks diving as fears rise that the US, which accuses China of mass theft of intellectual property and other unfair practises, could provoke a damaging trade war.
The Dow Jones Industrial Average plunged more than 700 points, while Tokyo closed 4.5 percent lower, Hong Kong fell 2.45 percent and Shanghai sank more than three percent.
“China does not want to fight a trade war, but it is absolutely not afraid of a trade war,” the commerce ministry said.
Hours earlier, Trump signed an order that also could result in restrictions on Chinese investment in the US, saying it would be the “first of many” trade actions.
“We have a tremendous intellectual property theft situation going on,” Trump said as he signed the new trade order, which could include duties as high as 25 percent.
The action did not immediately impose any new tariffs, but within two weeks US Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer is due to publish a list of the products that could be hit with tariffs.
US Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross on Thursday suggested the new measures on intellectual property were a way of bringing Beijing to the table, telling CNBC they were “the prelude to a set of negotiations”.
But a senior US official later said that Washington was “not interested in creating terms for a dialogue”.
“We are interested in creating some motivation for China to actually take concrete actions to further open their markets to US exports,” the official said on condition of anonymity, adding that the two sides are constantly talking.
China’s commerce ministry warned that a 15 percent tariff on 120 goods worth almost $1 billion — including fresh fruit, nuts and wine — would be imposed if the US fails to reach a “trade compensation agreement” within an unspecified timeframe.
In a second step, a 25 percent tariff would be imposed on eight goods totalling nearly $2 billion, including pork and aluminium scrap, after “further evaluating the impact of the US measures on China”, the statement said.
The measures were specifically in response to US steel and aluminium tariffs, which were taking effect Friday.
The list noticeably does not include soybeans, a key US export from Trump-voting states that Chinese state-run newspaper the Global Times had suggested should be targeted by Beijing.
Betty Wang, an economist at ANZ bank, said China’s reaction is “relatively mild”.
“From China’s perspective, it absolutely does not want to see a trade war. Coming back to the negotiation table is a relatively good result,” Wang said.
Years of ‘failed’ dialogue 
US Vice President Mike Pence hailed the new measures, saying they made it clear “the era of economic surrender is over”.
Senior White House economic advisor Everett Eissenstat said the new duties would target sectors where “China has sought to acquire an advantage through the unfair acquisition or forced technology transfer from US companies.”
Lighthizer indicated the industries could include aerospace, maritime and rail transport equipment, and new energy vehicles.
The order also directs the US Treasury to develop new proposals to increase safeguards against Chinese investments in the US that could compromise national security.
In addition, the United States launched a challenge at the World Trade Organization on Friday, saying in a statement that China appears to be breaking WTO rules by denying foreign patent holders rights “to stop a Chinese entity from using the technology after a licensing contract ends”.
The senior US official said Washington was “very optimistic” that allies such as Europe, Japan and Australia would join its WTO case.
White House officials said the actions came after years of efforts failed to convince China to change its behaviour.
While Trump hit out at China, he authorised the suspension of steel and aluminium tariffs on key trade partners — including the European Union and six other countries — until May 1.
But the EU said it would “reserve its rights” to impose countermeasures as long as the exemption remained temporary.
Pain for US consumers?
The United States had a record $375.2 billion goods trade deficit with China last year.
American industry, agriculture in particular, as well as members of the president’s own Republican party have voiced strident opposition to his recent trade moves.
The US Chamber of Commerce in Shanghai said American companies face market access barriers in China but it said both sides should avoid a trade war.
Influential Republican Senator Lindsey Graham said he was “very pleased” with the moves, but other Republicans called on Trump to be judicious in designing the tariffs, warning of consequences for American consumers.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to Migrate from Bootstrap Version 3 to Advance Bootstrap 4.

This article would illustrate and expatiate on how to  migrate from Bootstrap 3 to Bootstrap 4 ? You’re in luck; today we’ll walk through the changes and new features between versions. The changes you need to make are generally just class renames and some set-up. To save you a lot of time scouring the changelog, I have compiled a list of the things you need to know when migrating from Bootstrap 3 to Bootstrap 4. We will start by discussing the changes made in Bootstrap 4 framework and how it will affect your website performance. Then we will examine the new way of  installing bootstrap and how the grid measurement unit  has change and how  flexbox can help on responsive designs . We will also discuss changes to some of the components and take a look what happens to JavaScript on the new version. Finally, we’ll take a look at some of the new components including cards, tooltips and flexbox. If you are getting ready to migrate a site from the old Bootst...

World markets dive as Trump sparks trade, North Korea worries

Global stocks sank Wednesday after US President Donald Trump said he was not satisfied with talks that are aimed at averting a trade war with China. Equities were also dented by poor eurozone economic data, and as Trump cast doubt on a planned summit with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un. “Trump (is) continuing to drive uncertainty over global trade,” said analyst Joshua Mahony at trading firm IG. “European markets are following their Asian counterparts lower, as a pessimistic tone from Trump is compounded by downbeat economic data,” he added. Markets had surged Monday after US Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin and Chinese Vice Premier Liu He said they had agreed to pull back from imposing threatened tariffs on billions of dollars of goods, and continue talks on a variety of trade issues. However, Trump has declared that he was “not satisfied” with the status of the talks, fuelling worries that the world’s top two economies could still slug out an economically pain...

Saturated Fats vs. Unsaturated Fats.

Saturated Fats vs. Unsaturated Fats Diffen  ›  Food  ›  Diet & Nutrition The human body needs both  saturated fats  and  unsaturated fats  to remain healthy. Most dietary recommendations suggest that, of the daily intake of fat, a higher proportion should be from unsaturated fats, as they are thought to promote  good cholesterol  and help prevent cardiovascular disease, whereas an overabundance of saturated fats is thought to promote bad cholesterol. However,  a few studies  have found that little evidence for a strong link between the consumption of saturated fat and cardiovascular disease. Note: It is technically more accurate to call saturated and unsaturated fats types of  fatty acids , as it is specifically the  fatty acid  found in a fat that is either saturated or unsaturated. However, referring to fatty acids as fats is common. Comparison chart Saturated Fats versus Unsaturated F...